Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-12-05

REVANSIDDAYAYYA vs GANGAMMA @ SHASHIKALA .

Citation / case number
SC 2006/33524
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
REVANSIDDAYAYYA
Respondent
GANGAMMA @ SHASHIKALA .
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to grant possession of the suit land to the respondents, the legal heirs of the original owner, Veerabasayya, based on the expiration of the sale agreement dated 06.11.1986 due to efflux of time and the appellant's failure to execute the sale deed. The Court emphasized that mere possession under an expired agreement does not confer ownership rights, thereby affirming the legal principle that ownership is determined by inheritance and not by unexecuted agreements. The appeal by the appellant was dismissed, confirming the High Court's modification of the Trial Court's decree.

REVANSIDDAYAYYA vs GANGAMMA @ SHASHIKALA . · Niyam