Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-12-15

TATA IRON AND STEEL CO. LTD. vs STATE OF BIHAR .

Citation / case number
SC 2004/24653
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
TATA IRON AND STEEL CO. LTD.
Respondent
STATE OF BIHAR .
Author
Chelameswar
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision regarding the demand notice issued to Tata Iron & Steel Company Ltd. under Article 226 of the Constitution, affirming that the company does not have an absolute right to draw water from the Subarnrekha River without payment. The Court emphasized that the demand for payment was lawful under the Bihar Land Holdings Act and that the State has the authority to regulate water usage. The appeal was dismissed, confirming the legality of the demand notice dated 30.9.1993.

TATA IRON AND STEEL CO. LTD. vs STATE OF BIHAR . · Niyam