Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-12-14

THE STATE OF JHARKHAND vs M/S HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD.

Citation / case number
SC 2003/12269
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Respondent
M/S HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD.
Author
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
Bench
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR, HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court referred the question of whether it can entertain an application for making an arbitral award a Rule of the Court while retaining seisin over the arbitral proceedings to a larger bench. The case arose from disputes referred to arbitration, during which a suit was filed in the High Court seeking an interim injunction. The Court noted that the arbitration proceedings were inconclusive and subsequently referred both the claim and counterclaim to a retired judge for adjudication, emphasizing the need for expeditious resolution of the arbitration process under the Arbitration Act, 1940.

THE STATE OF JHARKHAND vs M/S HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. · Niyam