Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-12-12

Malik Industry vs The State Of Haryana State Of Haryana .

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2017 SC 656
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Malik Industry
Respondent
The State Of Haryana State Of Haryana .
Author
Kurian Joseph
Bench
Amitava Roy, Kurian Joseph

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the land acquisition proceedings against the appellants have lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, due to non-payment of compensation. The Court reaffirmed the applicability of its previous judgment in Pune Municipal Corporation & Anr. v. Harakchand Misirimal Solanki & Ors., (2014) 3 SCC 183, and allowed the appeals, granting respondents the opportunity to initiate fresh proceedings within six months.

Malik Industry vs The State Of Haryana State Of Haryana . · Niyam