Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-12-15

Vijendra Kumar And Ors. vs The Commissioner A.P. Charitable And ...

Citation / case number
AIR 2018 SUPREME COURT 473
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Vijendra Kumar And Ors.
Respondent
The Commissioner A.P. Charitable And ...
Author
Amitava Roy
Bench
Amitava Roy, N.V. Ramana

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision affirming that the temple in question is a public shrine under the Andhra Pradesh Hindu Charitable and Religious Institutions and Endowment Act of 1966, specifically referencing Section 77 and Section 92 of the Act. The Court established that the appellants failed to prove that the temple was dedicated for private worship, thus reinforcing the principle that a temple can be deemed public if it has been endowed for public use. The appeal was dismissed, confirming the temple's status as a public institution.

Vijendra Kumar And Ors. vs The Commissioner A.P. Charitable And ... · Niyam