Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-12-07

Nitya Dharmananda @ K. Lenin vs Sri Gopal Sheelum Reddy Also Known As ...

Citation / case number
AIR 2017 SUPREME COURT 5846
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Nitya Dharmananda @ K. Lenin
Respondent
Sri Gopal Sheelum Reddy Also Known As ...
Author
Adarsh Kumar Goel
Bench
Uday Umesh Lalit, Adarsh Kumar Goel

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the invocation of Section 91 of the Cr.P.C. at the charge framing stage, clarifying that while the accused cannot ordinarily invoke this section, the court may summon material not included in the chargesheet if it is crucial for justice. The Court emphasized that the necessity of such material must be assessed in relation to the charge framing stage, as established in State of Orissa v. Debendra Nath Padhi (2005) 1 SCC 568. The High Court's decision to allow the summoning of additional material was upheld, reinforcing the principle that justice must prevail even if the accused lacks a right to invoke Section 91 at this stage.

Nitya Dharmananda @ K. Lenin vs Sri Gopal Sheelum Reddy Also Known As ... · Niyam