Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-12-14

A.V.G.V. Ramu vs A.S.R. Bharathi

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
A.V.G.V. Ramu
Respondent
A.S.R. Bharathi
Author
Abhay Manohar Sapre
Bench
Abhay Manohar Sapre, R.K. Agrawal

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, holding that the mutual consent for divorce was valid as both parties had entered into an Agreement/MOU dated 30.12.2014, which was not denied by the respondent. The Court set aside the judgments of the Family Court and the High Court, emphasizing that the respondent's lack of appearance and failure to contest the agreement indicated consent for the dissolution of marriage. The Court exercised its powers under Article 142 of the Constitution to dissolve the marriage in accordance with the mutual agreement.

A.V.G.V. Ramu vs A.S.R. Bharathi · Niyam