Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-08-02

RAJIV KUMAR vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

Citation / case number
SC 2016/9045
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RAJIV KUMAR
Respondent
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
Author
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI
Bench
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the convictions of the appellants under Section 120-B IPC and Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, affirming the High Court's judgment which imposed a three-year imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 50,000 on each appellant. The Court found that the appellants conspired to abuse their positions in the NOIDA land allotment scams, thus establishing the legal principle that public officials can be held accountable for corruption under the P.C. Act. The appeals were dismissed, confirming the lower court's findings.

RAJIV KUMAR vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH · Niyam