Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-08-23

GOVIND PRASAD SHARMA vs DOON VALLEY OFFICERS COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD SECRETARY RETD. COLONEL A.P. KUMERI S/O SHRI G.D. KUMER

Citation / case number
SC 2015/8291
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
GOVIND PRASAD SHARMA
Respondent
DOON VALLEY OFFICERS COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD SECRETARY RETD. COLONEL A.P. KUMERI S/O SHRI G.D. KUMER
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the admissibility of a demarcation report in arbitration proceedings, referencing Sections 75 and 81 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court held that confidentiality must be maintained regarding conciliation proceedings, and the report could not be admitted as evidence under Section 81, which prohibits reliance on conciliator proposals. The High Court's decision to allow the report into evidence was set aside, reinforcing the principle of confidentiality in arbitration contexts.

GOVIND PRASAD SHARMA vs DOON VALLEY OFFICERS COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD SECRETARY RETD. COLONEL A.P. KUMERI S/O SHRI G.D. KUMER · Niyam