Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-08-18

THE STATE OF GOA vs JOSE MARIA ALBERT VALES ALIAS ROBERT VALES

Citation / case number
SC 2015/38293
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
THE STATE OF GOA
Respondent
JOSE MARIA ALBERT VALES ALIAS ROBERT VALES
Author
AMITAVA ROY
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court's decision to set aside the charge under Section 193 IPC was incorrect, as the case, initiated under Section 340 Cr.P.C., should be treated as if instituted on a police report per Section 343 Cr.P.C. The Court emphasized that the procedure under Section 244 Cr.P.C. was not applicable, and the Sessions Court's prima facie satisfaction warranted the framing of charges against the respondent. Consequently, the Court reinstated the charge against the respondent, affirming the need for adherence to procedural norms in criminal trials.

THE STATE OF GOA vs JOSE MARIA ALBERT VALES ALIAS ROBERT VALES · Niyam