Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-08-03

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 vs M/S. HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.

Citation / case number
SC 2013/30984
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1
Respondent
M/S. HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the interpretation of 'manufacturing' under Sections 80HH, 80-I, and 80-IA of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in the context of bottling Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) cylinders. The Court upheld the ITAT's finding that the bottling process constitutes manufacturing, as it involves significant technical operations and quality control, thus qualifying the assessees for tax deductions. The Court affirmed the High Court's decision, rejecting the Revenue's claim that bottling does not amount to manufacturing.

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 vs M/S. HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. · Niyam