Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-08-09

BOARD OF APPRENTICESHIP TRAINING (SR) AND ANR. vs M.ANBUMANI . AND ORS.

Citation / case number
SC 2007/3105
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
BOARD OF APPRENTICESHIP TRAINING (SR) AND ANR.
Respondent
M.ANBUMANI . AND ORS.
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH
Bench
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that a respondent is not entitled to pension if they have not opted for it within the stipulated time, as per the relevant pension rules. However, considering the peculiar facts of the case, the Court exercised its jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Constitution of India to uphold the High Court's decision granting pension benefits to the respondent. The Court clarified that this judgment should not be treated as a precedent for future cases due to its unique circumstances.

BOARD OF APPRENTICESHIP TRAINING (SR) AND ANR. vs M.ANBUMANI . AND ORS. · Niyam