Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-08-09

SUHAS RAMCHANDRA APTE vs VASANTRAO SHANKARRAO BHOSLE(D) THR. LRS.

Citation / case number
SC 2004/2265
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SUHAS RAMCHANDRA APTE
Respondent
VASANTRAO SHANKARRAO BHOSLE(D) THR. LRS.
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH
Bench
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the applicability of Section 11(3) of the Bombay Rent Act, 1947, in the context of a dispute arising in Gujarat, distinguishing it from the provision applicable in Mumbai. The Court allowed the appellant to file a review application before the High Court within 30 days, emphasizing that if the High Court had applied an incorrect provision, it should rectify its judgment accordingly. The Court did not consider the merits of the case and requested the High Court to expedite the review process within three months.

SUHAS RAMCHANDRA APTE vs VASANTRAO SHANKARRAO BHOSLE(D) THR. LRS. · Niyam