Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-08-08

P.D. Goel vs High Court Of Himachal Pradesh ...

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2017 SC 521
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
P.D. Goel
Respondent
High Court Of Himachal Pradesh ...
Author
S.Abdul Nazeer
Bench
S. Abdul Nazeer, J. Chelameswar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the legality of the retirement notification issued under Rule 14 of the Himachal Pradesh Judicial Service Rules, 2004, which stated that the appellant would retire at 58 years of age. The Court held that the notification was invalid as it was not issued by the appointing authority, the Governor, and that the adverse entry in the Annual Confidential Report was improperly made. The Court upheld the Single Judge's decision to strike down the notification and affirmed the appellant's entitlement to consequential benefits, emphasizing the necessity of adherence to proper authority in such matters.

P.D. Goel vs High Court Of Himachal Pradesh ... · Niyam