Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-08-01

R. Madhusudhan vs State Of Karnataka

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2017 SC 333
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
R. Madhusudhan
Respondent
State Of Karnataka
Author
Kurian Joseph
Bench
R.Banumathi, Kurian Joseph

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the denial of anticipatory bail under Section 18 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, holding that the Trial Court's grant of anticipatory bail was initially valid but should be reconsidered following the completion of the investigation and filing of the charge sheet. The Court directed the appellants to surrender before the Trial Court within one month and allowed the Trial Court to consider their application for regular bail on the same day of surrender, emphasizing that the merits of the case were not evaluated at this stage.

R. Madhusudhan vs State Of Karnataka · Niyam