Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-08-03

Rustom Kerawalla Foundation vs State Of Maharashtra .

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2017 SC 150
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Rustom Kerawalla Foundation
Respondent
State Of Maharashtra .
Author
Uday Umesh Lalit
Bench
Uday Umesh Lalit, Adarsh Kumar Goel

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the appeals from Rustom Kerawalla Foundation and Vibgyor High School regarding the disallowance of certain expenses by the Deputy Director of Education under the Maharashtra Educational Institutions (Prohibition of Capitation Fee) Act, 1987. The Court held that the expenses related to rent could not be classified as capitation fees under Sections 3 and 4 of the Act, affirming the High Court's decision to approve the prescribed fees while disallowing the rent expenses. The judgment clarified the interpretation of 'capitation fee' and upheld the regulatory framework established by the Act.

Rustom Kerawalla Foundation vs State Of Maharashtra . · Niyam