Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-08-04

U. Manjunath Rao vs U. Chandrashekar

Citation / case number
AIR 2017 SUPREME COURT 3591
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
U. Manjunath Rao
Respondent
U. Chandrashekar
Author
Dipak Misra
Bench
A.M. Khanwilkar, Dipak Misra

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the High Court's dismissal of an appeal concerning a partition deed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC). The Court found that the High Court failed to adequately consider the evidence regarding the existence of a joint family and the validity of the partition deed, which was claimed to contain an error in property description. The Court held that the High Court's judgment lacked sufficient reasoning and directed it to re-evaluate the appeal with proper consideration of the evidence presented.

U. Manjunath Rao vs U. Chandrashekar · Niyam