Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-04-24

FORMULA ONE WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP LTD vs COMMISSIOER OF INCOME TAX, INTERNATIONAL TXATION-3 DELHI

Citation / case number
SC 2017/1799
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
FORMULA ONE WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP LTD
Respondent
COMMISSIOER OF INCOME TAX, INTERNATIONAL TXATION-3 DELHI
Author
A.K. SIKRI
Bench
ASHOK BHUSHAN A.K. SIKRI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the appeals concerning the classification of payments made under a Race Promotion Contract (RPC) between Formula One World Championship Ltd. (FOWC) and Jaypee Sports International Ltd. The Court upheld the High Court's ruling that the payments did not constitute 'Royalty' under Article 13 of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) between India and the UK, and that FOWC did not have a Permanent Establishment (PE) in India as per Article 5 of the DTAA. Consequently, the Court ruled that the payments made by Jaypee to FOWC were not subject to tax at source under Section 195 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

FORMULA ONE WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP LTD vs COMMISSIOER OF INCOME TAX, INTERNATIONAL TXATION-3 DELHI · Niyam