Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-04-19

INDUS MOBILE DISTRIBUTION PVT. LTD. vs DATAWIND INNOVATIONS PVT. LTD. .

Citation / case number
SC 2016/31021
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
INDUS MOBILE DISTRIBUTION PVT. LTD.
Respondent
DATAWIND INNOVATIONS PVT. LTD. .
Author
R.F. NARIMAN
Bench
ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of jurisdiction in arbitration agreements, specifically whether an exclusive jurisdiction clause for Mumbai courts excludes the jurisdiction of other courts, including the High Court of Delhi. The Court held that the exclusive jurisdiction clause does not oust the jurisdiction of the High Court of Delhi, as the seat of arbitration being in Mumbai does not preclude the applicability of other courts. The judgment clarified the interpretation of arbitration clauses under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, particularly Sections 2(1)(e) and 34.

INDUS MOBILE DISTRIBUTION PVT. LTD. vs DATAWIND INNOVATIONS PVT. LTD. . · Niyam