Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-04-27

VENU vs PONNUSAMY REDDIAR (DEAD) THR. LRS

Citation / case number
SC 2008/8352
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
VENU
Respondent
PONNUSAMY REDDIAR (DEAD) THR. LRS
Author
AMITAVA ROY ARUN MISHRA
Bench
AMITAVA ROY ARUN MISHRA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that the execution of a preliminary decree for partition is not barred by limitation, even if the application is filed after thirty years, as the rights to claim partition remain active until a final decree is passed. The Court clarified that the application for the appointment of a court commissioner does not have a prescribed limitation period, thus allowing the decree holder to seek execution without being hindered by time constraints. The Court upheld the principle that the lis continues until the preliminary decree culminates in a final decree, referencing Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

VENU vs PONNUSAMY REDDIAR (DEAD) THR. LRS · Niyam