Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-04-10

State Of H.P vs Nirmala Devi

Citation / case number
AIR 2017 SUPREME COURT 1981
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of H.P
Respondent
Nirmala Devi
Author
A.K. Sikri
Bench
Ashok Bhushan, A.K. Sikri

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the appeal under Article 136 concerning the modification of the respondent's sentence by the High Court, which replaced imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 30,000 for offences under Sections 328, 307, and 392 IPC. The Court emphasized that while the respondent's conviction was upheld, the leniency shown by the High Court was questioned, particularly given the respondent's prior absconding during trial. The Court ultimately held that the High Court's decision to substitute imprisonment with a fine was not justified and reinstated the original sentence of imprisonment.

State Of H.P vs Nirmala Devi · Niyam