Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-04-06

Ajitsinh Arjunsinh Gohil vs Bar Council Of Gujarat And Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2017 SUPREME COURT 1927
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Ajitsinh Arjunsinh Gohil
Respondent
Bar Council Of Gujarat And Anr
Author
Dipak Misra
Bench
Dipak Misra, A.M. Khanwilkar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 36B(1) of the Advocates Act, 1961, the Bar Council of India (BCI) does not possess the authority to transfer disciplinary proceedings back to the State Bar Council for resolution. The Court emphasized that the BCI must adjudicate the complaint itself, as it is the apex statutory body with plenary powers. Consequently, the Court quashed the initiation of the disciplinary proceedings against the appellant, recognizing the undue delay and hardship caused by the ongoing process.

Ajitsinh Arjunsinh Gohil vs Bar Council Of Gujarat And Anr · Niyam