Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-04-12

Palure Bhaskar Rao Etc.Etc vs P.Ramaseshaiah & Ors. Etc

Citation / case number
AIR 2017 SUPREME COURT 1805
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Palure Bhaskar Rao Etc.Etc
Respondent
P.Ramaseshaiah & Ors. Etc
Bench
R. Banumathi, Kurian Joseph

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court interpreted the Andhra Pradesh Police Subordinate Service Rules, specifically addressing the appointment and seniority of Sub-Inspectors of Police (Civil) under Rule 15. The Court held that a Reserve Sub-Inspector appointed as Sub-Inspector (Civil) against the 5% quota retains seniority from the date of original appointment as Reserve Sub-Inspector, as per the provisions of Rule 15(a) and (c). The judgment clarifies the distinction between appointment by transfer and promotion, emphasizing the importance of statutory rules in determining seniority.

Palure Bhaskar Rao Etc.Etc vs P.Ramaseshaiah & Ors. Etc · Niyam