Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-09-27

R.VENKATA RAMUDU & ANR ETC. vs STATE OF A.P.TR.SEC..

Citation / case number
SC 2009/7867
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
R.VENKATA RAMUDU & ANR ETC.
Respondent
STATE OF A.P.TR.SEC..
Author
ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE CHELAMESWAR
Bench
ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE J. CHELAMESWAR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the legality of the retrospective placement of R. Venkata Ramudu on probation under Rule 16(a) of the A.P. State and Subordinate Service Rules, 1996. The Court held that such retrospective action is impermissible as it violates the principles of natural justice and the right to a fair hearing under Article 14 of the Constitution of India. Consequently, the Court set aside the High Court's judgment and ruled in favor of the appellant, affirming his status as a permanent employee.

R.VENKATA RAMUDU & ANR ETC. vs STATE OF A.P.TR.SEC.. · Niyam