Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-09-30

A.SATYANARAYANA REDDY vs PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT .

Citation / case number
SC 2005/14487
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
A.SATYANARAYANA REDDY
Respondent
PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT .
Author
V.S. SIRPURKAR S.B. SINHA
Bench
V.S. SIRPURKAR S.B. SINHA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court interpreted Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 concerning a Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS) implemented by the State of Andhra Pradesh. The Court held that the employees of Nagarjuna Cooperative Sugars Limited, who opted for VRS, were entitled to statutory terminal benefits but not to lay off compensation for the period they were not employed. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's decision that the VRS did not include lay off compensation claims, thus upholding the legality of the government's compensation package under the VRS.

A.SATYANARAYANA REDDY vs PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT . · Niyam