Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-09-30

State Of Up And Ors vs Z.U. Ansari

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2016 SC 657
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of Up And Ors
Respondent
Z.U. Ansari
Author
T.S. Thakur
Bench
V.Gopala Gowda, T.S.Thakur

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision that disciplinary proceedings against a retired government employee require prior sanction from the Governor under Section 351-A of the Civil Services Regulations, 1975, framed under Article 309 of the Constitution of India. The Court emphasized that the sanction granted by the Minister in-charge was insufficient and that Articles 166 and 309 operate in distinct fields. Consequently, the Court affirmed the quashing of the charge-sheet and disciplinary proceedings against the respondent, thereby entitling him to all consequential benefits.

State Of Up And Ors vs Z.U. Ansari · Niyam