Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-09-02

Saroj Maheshwari vs State Of Haryana & Ors

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2016 SC 112
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Saroj Maheshwari
Respondent
State Of Haryana & Ors
Author
Anil R. Dave
Bench
L. Nageswara Rao, Anil R. Dave

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court found that the High Court did not adequately examine the conflicting claims regarding possession of the land in question, which was asserted to be with the owners in 2002-2003, while the respondents claimed possession was taken in 1995-1996. The Court set aside the impugned orders and remanded the matter to the High Court for a fresh decision after hearing all parties. The appeals were allowed with no order as to costs.

Saroj Maheshwari vs State Of Haryana & Ors · Niyam