Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-09-08

M/S. Harish Chandra & Company vs State Of U.P. Thr. Superintending Eng

Citation / case number
AIR 2016 SC 4257
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S. Harish Chandra & Company
Respondent
State Of U.P. Thr. Superintending Eng
Author
Abhay Manohar Sapre
Bench
J. Chelameswar, Abhay Manohar Sapre

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to set aside the arbitration award under Section 30/33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, due to the arbitrator exceeding his jurisdiction and failing to consider relevant evidence. The Court emphasized that an arbitrator must adhere to the terms of the reference and cannot decide matters outside the scope of the agreement. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's ruling that the arbitration award was invalid.

M/S. Harish Chandra & Company vs State Of U.P. Thr. Superintending Eng · Niyam