Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-09-15

R. Mahalakshmi vs A. Kanchana And Ors

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
R. Mahalakshmi
Respondent
A. Kanchana And Ors
Author
L. Nageswara Rao
Bench
L. Nageswara Rao, Anil R. Dave

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the implications of Section 29 A of the Hindu Succession (Tamil Nadu Amendment) Act, 1989, which grants daughters equal rights as sons in ancestral property. The Court held that the Appellant, who married after the amendment, is entitled to a 6/20 share of the property, alongside the Second Defendant, while the First and Third Defendants, who married before the amendment, are entitled to 1/20 share each. The matter was remitted to the Trial Court to ensure all inherited properties were included in the partition suit, affirming the rights of daughters in coparcenary property.

R. Mahalakshmi vs A. Kanchana And Ors · Niyam