Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-10-18

RAJENDER BANSAL vs BHURU (D) THR. LRS. .

Citation / case number
SC 2014/17529
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RAJENDER BANSAL
Respondent
BHURU (D) THR. LRS. .
Author
A.K. SIKRI
Bench
N.V. RAMANA A.K. SIKRI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that once an area is brought under the Haryana Rent Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973, the jurisdiction of civil courts to adjudicate eviction suits ceases, and landlords must seek eviction through the Rent Controller. The Court clarified that the applicability of the Rent Act extends to pending suits if the area is notified during the pendency, thus providing tenants with protection under the Act. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower court's decree for eviction based on the new jurisdictional framework.

RAJENDER BANSAL vs BHURU (D) THR. LRS. . · Niyam