Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-10-04

A. Ayyasamy vs A. Paramasivam & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2016 SUPREME COURT 4675
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
A. Ayyasamy
Respondent
A. Paramasivam & Ors
Author
A.K. Sikri
Bench
A.K. Sikri, D.Y. Chandrachud

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the existence of an arbitration agreement mandates referral of disputes to arbitration, even in cases where allegations of fraud are made. The Court found that the trial court and High Court erred in relying on the precedent set in N. Radhakrishnan v. Maestro Engineers, which was deemed per incuriam by the Court in Swiss Timing Ltd. v. Commonwealth Games 2010 Organising Committee. Consequently, the Court allowed the appeal and directed the matter to be referred to arbitration as per the partnership deed's arbitration clause.

A. Ayyasamy vs A. Paramasivam & Ors · Niyam