Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-11-10

MANGANESE ORE INDIA LTD. vs STATE OF M.P..

Citation / case number
SC 2012/7560
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MANGANESE ORE INDIA LTD.
Respondent
STATE OF M.P..
Author
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court interpreted the terms 'mineral' and 'processing' under the Madhya Pradesh Electricity Duty Act, 1949, specifically focusing on Section 3(1) and the definition of 'mine' in Explanation (b). The Court held that the definition of 'mine' includes premises and machinery used for processing minerals, affirming the validity of the duty imposed on electricity consumption in mining operations. The appeals by Manganese Ore India Ltd. were dismissed, upholding the High Court's decision.

MANGANESE ORE INDIA LTD. vs STATE OF M.P.. · Niyam