UCO BANK vs DIPAK DEBBARMA .

The Supreme Court held that the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (Act of 2002) prevails over Section 187 of the Tripura Land Revenue and Land Reforms Act, 1960, which restricts the sale of mortgaged properties to members of Scheduled Tribes. The Court clarified that inclusion of the Tripura Act in the Ninth Schedule does not confer immunity from being overridden by a Parliamentary statute. Consequently, the High Court's decision to invalidate the sale notification was overturned, affirming the legality of the auction process under the Act of 2002.