Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-11-11

JINDAL STAINLESS LTD. vs STATE OF HARYANA .

Citation / case number
SC 2002/5067
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
JINDAL STAINLESS LTD.
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA .
Author
T.S. THAKUR,A.K. SIKRI,S.A. BOBDE,SHIVA KIRTI SINGH,N.V. RAMANA
Bench
T.S. THAKUR,A.K. SIKRI,S.A. BOBDE,SHIVA KIRTI SINGH,N.V. RAMANA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the constitutional validity of the Haryana Local Area Development Tax Act, 2000, determining that it violates Article 301 of the Constitution and is not saved by Article 304. The Court examined the concept of 'compensatory tax' and its parameters, concluding that the Act's imposition of entry tax on goods entering local areas constitutes an unconstitutional levy. The Court held that the Act cannot impose sales tax on inter-State sales, thereby ruling in favor of the appellants, including Jindal Strips Ltd.

JINDAL STAINLESS LTD. vs STATE OF HARYANA . · Niyam