Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-11-10

Manganese Ore India Ltd vs State Of M.P.& Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2017 SUPREME COURT 87
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Manganese Ore India Ltd
Respondent
State Of M.P.& Ors
Author
Dipak Misra
Bench
Shiva Kirti Singh, Dipak Misra

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the interpretation of 'mine' and 'processing' under the Madhya Pradesh Electricity Duty Act, 1949, specifically focusing on Section 3(1) and its Explanation (b). The Court held that the definition of 'mine' includes premises or machinery used for processing minerals, affirming the High Court's dismissal of the writ petition challenging the constitutionality of the Act's provisions. The judgment clarified the scope of the term 'adjacent' in relation to mining activities, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive examination of the definitions provided in the Act.

Manganese Ore India Ltd vs State Of M.P.& Ors · Niyam