Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-11-08

Oasis Dealcom Pvt. Ltd vs Khazana Dealcomm Pvt.Ltd. & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2016 SUPREME COURT 5405
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Oasis Dealcom Pvt. Ltd
Respondent
Khazana Dealcomm Pvt.Ltd. & Ors
Author
Anil R. Dave
Bench
Uday Umesh Lalit, Anil R. Dave

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the application of Section 13(2) of The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, affirming that the bank's notice for recovery of dues was valid despite the borrowers disputing the amount. The Court clarified that the procedures outlined in the Act and the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 must be followed, including the requirement for proper notice and advertisement. The appeal against the High Court's dismissal of the revision petition was dismissed, affirming the lower court's orders.

Oasis Dealcom Pvt. Ltd vs Khazana Dealcomm Pvt.Ltd. & Ors · Niyam