Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-05-11

CELLULAR OPERATORS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA vs TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA .

Citation / case number
SC 2016/8121
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
CELLULAR OPERATORS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA
Respondent
TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA .
Author
R.F. Nariman
Bench
ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN KURIAN JOSEPH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the Telecom Consumers Protection (Ninth Amendment) Regulations, 2015, which mandates that cellular service providers credit the calling consumer with one rupee for each call drop within their network, as per the powers conferred by Section 36 and Section 11 of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997. The Court emphasized that the regulations are aimed at enhancing consumer protection and ensuring accountability among service providers. The appeals by various telecom operators were dismissed, affirming the regulatory framework established by TRAI.

CELLULAR OPERATORS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA vs TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA . · Niyam