Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-05-03

SOORAJ KUMAR vs TAHSILDAR

Citation / case number
SC 2015/22142
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SOORAJ KUMAR
Respondent
TAHSILDAR
Author
KURIAN
Bench
ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN KURIAN JOSEPH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the appellant's challenge against the auction sale of his property initiated by the government, asserting that the proceedings were flawed due to lack of proper inquiry into market value. The Court allowed the appellant to settle his dues under the applicable Amnesty Scheme, stating that if he complies, the auction proceedings could be recalled and the property restored. The Court directed that any application filed by the appellant regarding this matter be resolved within three months, and the amount previously deposited would be adjusted against his dues.

SOORAJ KUMAR vs TAHSILDAR · Niyam