Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-05-05

Vijay Latka & Anr vs State Of Haryana & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2016 SUPREME COURT 2584
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Vijay Latka & Anr
Respondent
State Of Haryana & Ors
Bench
Rohinton Fali Nariman, Kurian Joseph

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, if compensation has not been paid to the landowner after an award under Section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, the acquisition proceedings lapse. The Court found that the appellants were entitled to relief as the State had not paid compensation, emphasizing that it is the responsibility of the Requisitioning Authority to ensure payment without requiring the landowner to approach them. The Court left open the question of whether the manner of possession taken satisfied statutory requirements.

Vijay Latka & Anr vs State Of Haryana & Ors · Niyam