Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-05-05

Ghanshyam Sukhdeo Gaikwad And Ors vs Bajaj Auto Ltd. & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2016 SUPREME COURT 2255
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Ghanshyam Sukhdeo Gaikwad And Ors
Respondent
Bajaj Auto Ltd. & Ors
Bench
Rohinton Fali Nariman, Kurian Joseph

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court, invoking Article 142 of the Constitution, directed the Management to pay each appellant a lump sum of Rs. 10 Lakhs as settlement of dues, while clarifying that this amount does not include Gratuity and Provident Fund claims. The Court noted that the appellants had been receiving regular wages since 2002 and had not been assigned work since April 2003. The decision was made in light of the lengthy litigation history and the age factor of the appellants, ensuring justice is served despite the lack of agreement between parties.

Ghanshyam Sukhdeo Gaikwad And Ors vs Bajaj Auto Ltd. & Ors · Niyam