Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-05-05

Muddasani Venkata Narsaiah(D)Tr.Lrs vs Muddasani Sarojana

Citation / case number
AIR 2016 SUPREME COURT 2250
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Muddasani Venkata Narsaiah(D)Tr.Lrs
Respondent
Muddasani Sarojana
Author
Arun Mishra
Bench
V. Gopala Gowda, Arun Mishra

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the trial Court's dismissal of the plaintiff's suit for possession and mesne profits was justified, as the plaintiff failed to prove the passing of consideration under the sale deed dated 25.4.1981 and the factum of adoption of defendant no. 3 by Yashoda. The Court emphasized that the plaintiff must establish his title independently rather than relying on the defendants' weaknesses. The High Court's reversal of the first appellate Court's decree was upheld, confirming that Buchamma was not the sole heir and that the plaintiff's claim lacked merit under the relevant property laws.

Muddasani Venkata Narsaiah(D)Tr.Lrs vs Muddasani Sarojana · Niyam