Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-03-31

LIC OF INDIA vs KRISHNA MURARI LAL ASTHANA AND ANR ETC.

Citation / case number
SC 2013/25126
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
LIC OF INDIA
Respondent
KRISHNA MURARI LAL ASTHANA AND ANR ETC.
Author
Dipak Misra
Bench
R. BANUMATHI DIPAK MISRA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the interpretation of pension rights under the Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956, specifically Sections 21 and 48. The Court held that pension is not a bounty but a right that must be conferred in accordance with the rules and policies established under the Act. The appeals were decided in favor of the employees, affirming their entitlement to the pension benefits promised by the Corporation, thereby reinforcing the legal principle that pension rights are protected under statutory provisions.

LIC OF INDIA vs KRISHNA MURARI LAL ASTHANA AND ANR ETC. · Niyam