Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-03-30

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE vs M/S. GRASIM INDUSTRIES LTD. THROUGH ITS SECRETARY

Citation / case number
SC 2004/5590
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE
Respondent
M/S. GRASIM INDUSTRIES LTD. THROUGH ITS SECRETARY
Author
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that the amended Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, which introduced the concept of 'transaction value', does not alter the principle established in Collector of Central Excise, Madras Vs. M/s Indian Oxygen Ltd. regarding the non-inclusion of certain charges (like packing and service charges) in the assessable value of excisable goods. The Court held that such charges recovered by manufacturers for containers and canisters should not be added to the price of goods for duty assessment under Section 4. Consequently, the Tribunal's decision was upheld, affirming the existing legal interpretation.

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE vs M/S. GRASIM INDUSTRIES LTD. THROUGH ITS SECRETARY · Niyam