Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-03-03

Score Information Technologies Ltd vs Sriyash Technologies Ltd. & Ors

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2016 SC 99
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Score Information Technologies Ltd
Respondent
Sriyash Technologies Ltd. & Ors
Bench
Rohinton Fali Nariman, Kurian Joseph

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Division Bench's decision to set aside the arrangement between the Transport Commissioner of Uttarakhand and HILTRON for the Smart Card based driving licence project, citing a lack of transparency in the contract process, which violates the principles of Article 14 of the Constitution. The Court emphasized that while the State is not obligated to invite tenders in all cases, any contract must be transparent and publicly disclosed to ensure fairness. The appeal was allowed, affirming the Division Bench's ruling that the arrangement was invalid due to procedural opacity.

Score Information Technologies Ltd vs Sriyash Technologies Ltd. & Ors · Niyam