Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-03-02

State Of Orissa & Anr vs Abani Ballav Dey & Ors

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2016 SC 140
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of Orissa & Anr
Respondent
Abani Ballav Dey & Ors
Bench
Rohinton Fali Nariman, Kurian Joseph

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court dismissed the application for intervention and upheld the High Court's order regarding the compromise under Order 23 Rule 3 of the CPC. The Court noted that the compromise required permission from the Commissioner of Endowments as per Section 19 of the Orissa Hindu Religious Endowments Act (OHRE Act), and the objections raised by the Commissioner regarding the low compensation and the interest of the institution were valid. The Court concluded that the compromise was not maintainable due to the lack of necessary permissions, affirming the High Court's decision.

State Of Orissa & Anr vs Abani Ballav Dey & Ors · Niyam