Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-03-02

Uttam vs Saubhag Singh & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2016 SUPREME COURT 1169
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Uttam
Respondent
Saubhag Singh & Ors
Author
R.F. Nariman
Bench
R.F. Nariman, Kurian Joseph

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision that a grandson has no birthright to claim partition of ancestral property during the lifetime of his father, as established under Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. The Court confirmed that the property in question was ancestral, but since the grandfather's share devolved upon his Class I heirs upon his death, the grandson could not sue for partition while his father was alive. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower courts' rulings that the plaintiff lacked the right to partition.

Uttam vs Saubhag Singh & Ors · Niyam