Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

june 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-06-29

GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTHORITY vs SAVITRI MOHAN (D) THR. LRS

Citation / case number
SC 2014/16271
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTHORITY
Respondent
SAVITRI MOHAN (D) THR. LRS
Author
ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
Bench
ADARSH KUMAR GOEL ANIL R. DAVE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to set aside the notifications under Section 4(1) and Section 6 read with Section 17(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, stating that the urgency clause was improperly invoked, depriving landowners of their right to object. The Court emphasized that the invocation of urgency must be justified and cannot override the rights of landowners without due process. The appeal by Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority was dismissed, affirming the need for adherence to legal procedures in land acquisition.

GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTHORITY vs SAVITRI MOHAN (D) THR. LRS · Niyam