Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

june 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-06-29

V. VENKATA PRASAD vs HIGH COURT OF A.P. .

Citation / case number
SC 2012/12093
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
V. VENKATA PRASAD
Respondent
HIGH COURT OF A.P. .
Author
Dipak Misra
Bench
SHIVA KIRTI SINGH DIPAK MISRA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the Andhra Pradesh State Higher Judicial Service Special Rules for Adhoc Appointments, 2001, particularly Rule 2 regarding the appointment of District and Sessions Judges on an ad hoc basis. The Court held that appointments must be made based on merit and ability, with seniority considered only when merit is equal, and clarified that ad hoc appointees do not gain permanent status or preferential rights under Rule 7. The Court upheld the validity of the 2001 Rules and the appointments made under them, dismissing the appeal.

V. VENKATA PRASAD vs HIGH COURT OF A.P. . · Niyam