Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

june 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-06-29

M/S. EMM ENN ASSOCIATES vs COMMANDER WORKS ENGINEER .

Citation / case number
SC 2007/19624
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S. EMM ENN ASSOCIATES
Respondent
COMMANDER WORKS ENGINEER .
Author
ASHOK BHUSHAN
Bench
ASHOK BHUSHAN ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, a party can seek appointment of an arbitrator only if a live dispute exists. The Court found that the appellant's claim was barred by the two-year limitation period as stipulated in the contract's Clause 67, which precludes recovery of over-payments beyond this period. Consequently, the Court upheld the High Court's dismissal of the application for arbitration, affirming that no arbitrable dispute existed.

M/S. EMM ENN ASSOCIATES vs COMMANDER WORKS ENGINEER . · Niyam