Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-07-29

SUDHIR CHAUDHARY ETC. ETC. vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

Citation / case number
SC 2015/6160
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SUDHIR CHAUDHARY ETC. ETC.
Respondent
STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
Author
D Y CHANDRACHUD
Bench
T.S. THAKUR,A.M. KHANWILKAR,D.Y. CHANDRACHUD

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the legality of obtaining voice samples from the Appellants under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, specifically under Section 53. The Court held that while consent for voice samples can be given, the accused cannot dictate the terms of the sample collection once consent is provided. The Court affirmed the High Court's dismissal of the petition under Section 482 CrPC, thereby upholding the orders of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate and the Additional Sessions Judge regarding the voice sample collection process.

SUDHIR CHAUDHARY ETC. ETC. vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI) · Niyam